Planning Case Study 35
Manchester Metrolink Second City Crossing, Manchester
Planning scenario(s)
Heritage assets affected
Non-designated heritage assets of archaeological and historic interest
Type of application & broad category
Local planning authority
Authority: Manchester City Council
References: 2CC Parliamentary Order; 100118/VO/2012/C1 and EIA
Development proposal
Metrolink second city crossing.
Archaeological information known about the site before the planning application was made, or before the development commenced, as appropriate
Minimal, a few HER entries with not much detail.
Archaeological/planning processes
An Environmental Statement was produced for the proposed Metrolink route (URS 2012). This included an assessment of the potential for a graveyard extending into Cross Street and the potential impacts of the proposed development.
A detailed desk based assessment and archaeological trial trenching in 2013 identified intact burial vaults under St Peters Church in St Peters Square, Manchester. Negotiations between archaeologists (including the archaeological planning adviser to Manchester City Council) and Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) established that it would be possible and cost effective to protect the burial chambers in situ by putting concrete rafts over the vaults to support the weight of the new Metrolink platforms and rails.
Further along the route, on Cross Street, the archaeologists’ research and test trenching showed that a former part of the Cross Street Chapel graveyard had survived under a 19th century widening scheme for Cross Street, whereas the rest of the graveyard had been removed in the 1970s.
The site was the main centre of Unitarianism in Manchester from the late 17th century onwards and a chapel still exists there. TfGM dealt with the sensitive issues regarding the treatment of the remains according to best archaeological practice. This was achieved through the archaeology strategy which included where necessary the excavation of burials, which were respectfully re-buried at Southern Cemetery, and the preservation of some of the burials in situ through careful planning.
The archaeological work delayed the scheme and it can be argued that earlier evaluation and costing of exhumation would have helped. However, the scheme demonstrated the value of archaeologists working closely with project managers and engineers to reduce impact and preserve some of the human remains in situ at deeper levels at the former Cross Street Chapel and all of the human remains and vaults at St Peters’ Church.
Outcomes: archaeological
Crypts and burials were preserved under St Peter’s church.
The archaeology strategy achieved selective excavation, preservation and reburial at Cross St.
Other outcomes/outputs e.g. other public benefit such as public engagement, research and new/changed work practices
The c.250 burials excavated at Cross St provided a significant study of the impact of industrialisation on a middle class sector of 18th and 19th century Manchester society.
A GM Past Revealed publication is to be prepared and published, along with an academic article.
References and links/bibliography
- URS 2012, The Transport for Greater Manchester: Light Rapid Transit System, Second City Crossing, Environmental Statement, May 2012
- CFA Archaeology Ltd 2016, Cross Street Chapel Manchester: Archaeological Excavation and Exhumation Assessment Report. Unpublished report No. Y220/16.