The advisory checklist specifies the criteria against the three types of specialist report:
- Type 1: Description - for relatively insignificant assemblages
- Type 2: Appraisal - where there is the potential for further work
- Type 3: Full analysis - following detailed analysis of significant assemblages
Table definitions:
- X - include this
- O - include this if possible or appropriate
Overall Project Report | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Quantification of overall site assemblage by category, eg coins, pottery, iron, animal bone, charcoal (as minimum tabulated by weight for bulk finds/enviro, item count for registered finds) |
X | X | X |
Description of recovery strategy, eg hand collection, bulk sample derived, metal detector |
X | X | X |
Description of excavation sampling strategy |
X | X | X |
Description of selection strategy |
X | X | X |
Location of final archive (digital and physical) including repository accession number |
X | X | X |
Interpretation of the overall material assemblage, incorporating discussion of the local and wider context and the evidence from the site as a whole |
X | X | X |
|
|||
Specialist Report (material or object categories, eg animal bone; coins) | |||
Document information | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Title of report incorporating subject and project name |
X | X | X |
Name of author (including qualifications) |
X | X | X |
Date of data collection/recording |
X | X | X |
Date of analysis/report completion |
X | X | X |
Introduction | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Summary of the nature of the assemblage and its significance |
X | X | X |
Overall size of assemblage (eg total count and weight) |
X | X | X |
Aims of the report |
X | X | X |
Description of recovery strategy, eg hand collection, bulk samples derived, metal detector |
X | X | X |
Description of environmental sampling strategy (if relevant) |
X | X | X |
Summary of relevant context information/feature types (avoiding repetition of stratigraphic narrative) |
X | X | X |
Range of dates/periods/phases represented in the assemblage |
X | X | X |
Methodology | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Description of methods of study: methods of both identification and quantification |
X | X | X |
Reference methods of study to existing and appropriate standards |
X | X | X |
Identification of formal reference/research collections or type series used during recording, eg physical type series, online type series, environmental collections |
X | X | X |
Reference to use of source material/bibliographic resources/thesaurus during recording, eg published corpus |
X | X | X |
Concordance of codes/abbreviations and their meanings |
X | X | X |
Description of any scientific analysis carried out |
X | X | X |
Description of archive products of the recording process |
X | X | X |
Description of selection of the assemblage for archive |
X | X | X |
Quantification | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Quantification of assemblage category overall by an appropriate method, eg individual object count, fragment count or weight (eg number of coins; quantities of bone; quantities of pottery) |
X | X | X |
Higher-level quantification by an appropriate method (eg Estimated Vessel Equivalent (EVE), Minimum Number of Vessels (MNV), Minimum Number of Individuals (MNI), Number of Identified Specimens (NISP)) |
X | ||
Characterisation | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Material classified to an appropriate level: eg glass/colourless glass; stone/limestone/oolitic limestone; pottery/earthenware/Malvern ware; animal bone/large mammal/sheep; charcoal/oak; slag/iron slag/smithing slag |
X | X | X |
Objects classified at basic level, eg coin, brooch, jar, scraper, tibia |
X | X | X |
Objects classified at detailed level, eg denarius, bow brooch, globular jar, thumbnail scraper, left tibia |
O | O | X |
Artefacts classified by diagnostic components, eg variation of rims, brooch plates, obverse/reverse of coins |
O | X | |
Artefact descriptions include specific details, eg decoration, surface treatment, eg incised, glazed, burnished, stamped |
X | X | |
Description of condition and/or completeness, eg levels of abrasion, brokenness, wear, count of fragments, burnt |
O | X | X |
Description of condition in relation to taphonomic processes of deposition and preservation (especially for ecofacts/environmental remains) |
X | ||
Description of evidence of use/alteration, eg burning, sooting, wear patterns, butchery marks, adze marks, repair, residues and limescale |
X | X | |
Description of manufacture/technology, eg method of manufacture/feature of manufacture (such as thread count) |
X | X | |
Integration of results of scientific analysis (chemical composition; geological character) | O | X | X |
Significance, potential and recommendations | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Statement of significance and potential of material/assemblage |
X | X | |
Statement of contribution of material/assemblage to project research aims |
O | X | X |
Statement of new material/assemblage-led research aims |
X | ||
Recommendation for further recording and analysis |
X | ||
Recommendation for illustration |
O | X | |
Contextualisation | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Discussion of assemblage in relation to contextual information | X | X | X |
Discussion of assemblage in relation to chronological sequence, character of site, function of features, site formation processes | X | ||
Interpretation | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Detailed discussion of assemblage in its own terms, eg relative proportions of different types, of different dates |
X | X | X |
Discussion of assemblage in relation to excavated evidence |
O | X | X |
Discussion of assemblage in relation to chronological sequence, character of site, function of features, site formation processes | O | X | |
Discussion of the assemblage as evidence for the way of life as represented at the site over time | X | ||
Integrated discussion with other evidence from the site to explore aspects such as site/feature morphology, site function and socio-economic context |
X | ||
Discussion of the assemblage in local, regional and wider context, in relation to other site assemblages, to explore economic and social context, eg trade, supply, distribution, consumption |
X | ||
Presentation | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Presentation of quantified data in standardised form, eg appropriate use of graphs/tables |
X | X | X |
Presentation of quantified data, related to context/structural sequence/phasing |
X | X | |
Presentation of detailed characterisation data (eg fabric/ware types) to context/structural sequence/phasing | X | ||
Presentation of descriptive information in standardised forms, eg tables |
O | X | X |
Presentation of scientific data in accessible form, eg tables, plots, graphs |
X | X | |
Catalogue (as a minimum all illustrated items should be accompanied by a catalogue) including standardised description of object/item as appropriate to find type, eg context, descriptor, condition, completeness, count, weight, dimensions, stratigraphic group/feature |
X | X | |
Illustration; through drawing, photography, x-radiographs, digital imaging |
X | X | |
Bibliography |
X | X | X |
Acknowledgements |
X | X | X |